Session 1, Read and notice: A source is not a whole story
Week 33 big question: How can we tell which part of a story has proof?
Start with a story (optional) Look Again! — Read it hereSupporting match · Putti keeps seeing surprising things, until her big sister says, “Look again!”
A primary source was made then, or by someone who was there.
Picture an old letter next to a new book about it. The letter is a primary source, made then or by someone who was there. An object or photo from that time could be one, too. So could someone’s memory of being there. A secondary source explains evidence, often later. Both kinds can help, but either can be wrong or leave things out. Ask who made each one, when, why, and what it shows.
A rule he wrote down does not prove he kept it.
Young George Washington copied rules on how to act in a notebook. One rule he copied said, “Think before you Speak.” Can that rule tell us what he did each day? This primary source shows advice he studied. He did not make up the rules. A secondary source today explains how he wrote them down. Both help us learn what he studied. But neither proves he always followed that advice.
Plans for later go in the future part.
Now picture a line with true events from your own life. Yesterday belongs in the recent past, while a decade means ten years. For a longer stretch of time, a century means one hundred years. A generation is one family step, with no fixed length. Think of a child, a parent, and a grandparent as three steps. Other caregivers can be family, too. Keep plans in a space marked “future,” apart from things you know happened. Which real event will you add first?
Show what you notice
- Look at the old rule and the new account. What do they both show? What do they not prove?
- Where does each go? Is it a real thing from yesterday, or an older thing from your life? Is it a plan for later?
Answer your waypointact it outtell or dictatewrite

